15-MINUTE WALKTHROUGH

See how universities standardize invention figures across research and TTO

A practical system overview for academic leadership, TTO teams, and research programs.

This walkthrough shows how universities can standardize invention figures across labs, disclosures, and patent filings — improving clarity, reducing redraw cycles, and accelerating the path to filing. Watch it to quickly decide if this fits your institutional workflow.
IP DaVinci Patent Drawing System demo walkthrough for universities

Watch the 15-Minute Demo

Understand how the system works and whether it fits your research and TTO workflow.

What You’ll See in the Demo

From research bottlenecks → system → rollout across departments.

THE PROBLEM

Where invention visuals slow the pipeline

Why disclosures and patent preparation become inefficient.

  • Researchers use inconsistent formats (slides, sketches, screenshots)
  • TTO teams spend time interpreting instead of evaluating
  • Redraw cycles delay filing decisions
  • Vendor costs and queue time add friction

THE SYSTEM

How IP DaVinci standardizes the process

A simple system built on familiar tools.

  • Microsoft Visio as the platform
  • Focused training for researchers and staff
  • Templates that enforce structure automatically

THE WORKFLOW

One file across research → TTO → counsel

How figures move without rework.

  • Researcher captures the invention clearly
  • TTO evaluates without reinterpretation
  • Counsel works from structured inputs
  • Revisions happen in the same file

ACCESS

Flexible deployment across campus

Works in real academic environments.

  • Visio often already included via Microsoft 365
  • Cloud option for mixed-device environments
  • Fast onboarding for labs and cohorts

ROLLOUT

Pilot → standardize → scale

How universities implement without disruption.

  • Start with one lab or department
  • Align disclosure structure across teams
  • Expand across programs or campus
  • Optional integration into coursework

What Improves at the Institutional Level

Better inputs → faster decisions → stronger IP outcomes.

Higher-quality disclosures

Structured figures make inventions easier to evaluate.

  • Clearer embodiment communication
  • Less ambiguity
  • Fewer clarification loops

Faster disclosure-to-filing decisions

TTO and counsel work from clearer inputs.

  • Shorter review cycles
  • Faster go/no-go decisions
  • Same-day iteration when needed

Reduced vendor dependence

Routine figure work can be handled internally.

  • Lower external costs
  • Less queue time
  • More predictable workflow

Is This a Fit for Your Institution?

This system is a strong fit if:

  • Your TTO receives inconsistent or unclear invention visuals
  • Disclosure review requires interpretation and follow-up
  • Filing timelines are slowed by redraw cycles or coordination

It may not be necessary if:

  • Your current disclosure process is already standardized and efficient
  • Figure preparation rarely creates delays

Most institutions know within one walkthrough whether this will improve their workflow.

Want to evaluate this for your program or campus?

See pricing or book a short call to discuss a pilot.

FAQs

Is this walkthrough training?
No. This is a system overview. Training is included in academic or Starter Package access.
Do researchers need drafting experience?
No. The system is designed for non-drafters.
Does this help beyond patents?
Yes. The same structured diagrams are useful for publications, grants, and presentations.
How does this work with TTO teams?
TTO teams receive clearer, standardized inputs, reducing interpretation and speeding review.
How does software access work?
Use local Visio where available, or cloud when needed.
Does this guarantee patent outcomes?
No. It improves workflow clarity and efficiency, but legal outcomes remain the responsibility of the institution.