FREE ASSESSMENT

Patent Figure Workflow Assessment

Determine how efficiently your practice handles patent figure creation, revisions, Office Actions, vendor dependency, and long-term figure continuity.

About This Assessment

This assessment evaluates:

• Figure Creation

• Revision Management

• Vendor Dependency

• Inventor Collaboration

• Prosecution Continuity

• Workflow Efficiency

Time Required: 5-10 Minutes

What You'll Receive

Workflow Score

Measure workflow maturity.

Category Breakdown

Identify strengths and weaknesses.

Improvement Opportunities

Discover operational bottlenecks.

Recommended Next Steps

Receive personalized recommendations.

Take the Assessment

Rate each statement from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).

Figure Creation

1. We can create new patent figures without significant delays.

2. Inventor sketches and concepts can be converted into formal figures efficiently.

3. Our figure creation process is documented and repeatable.

4. Figure preparation rarely delays application drafting.

5. We can quickly create flowcharts, system diagrams, and process figures.

Revision Management

1. Small figure changes can be completed immediately.

2. Office Action figure revisions are handled efficiently.

3. Claim amendments rarely require figures to be recreated.

4. Figure updates are completed without excessive coordination.

5. Revision cycles remain manageable throughout prosecution.

Vendor Dependency

1. We are not dependent on outside vendors for routine figure updates.

2. Routine numbering and annotation changes can be handled internally.

3. Minor drawing corrections do not require outsourcing.

4. Vendor turnaround times rarely affect filing schedules.

5. We can decide strategically when outsourcing is necessary.

Inventor Collaboration

1. Inventors can review figures efficiently.

2. Inventor feedback is incorporated quickly.

3. Visual communication reduces misunderstandings.

4. Figure discussions help clarify embodiments.

5. Inventors are satisfied with figure turnaround times.

Prosecution Continuity

1. Figures remain editable after filing.

2. Office Action revisions are performed using existing source files.

3. Continuation applications can reuse prior figures efficiently.

4. Related applications can reuse figure assets.

5. Figure continuity is maintained throughout prosecution.

Workflow Efficiency

1. Attorneys spend minimal time coordinating figure changes.

2. Support staff can handle routine figure work.

3. Templates are used consistently.

4. Figure standards are documented.

5. Figure workflows scale effectively as workload increases.

Ready to Benchmark Your Workflow?

Complete the assessment to discover where workflow friction exists, where improvement opportunities exist, and what next steps may provide the greatest impact.
RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP

Improve Your Patent Figure Workflow

Discover practical ways to reduce figure-related delays, improve revision efficiency, strengthen inventor collaboration, and maintain continuity throughout prosecution.

Patent Drawing Capability Assessment

Evaluate your ability to create, revise, and manage patent figures internally.

Friday Patent Drawing Workshop

Learn practical figure workflows, revision techniques, and prosecution best practices.

Patent Drawing School

Build long-term workflow capability through structured, self-paced training.