Innovation Communication Maturity Assessment
Determine your organization's current innovation communication maturity level, identify bottlenecks, and discover what is required to improve invention throughput, disclosure quality, and innovation scalability.
About This Assessment
The IP DaVinci Innovation Communication Maturity Model™ defines five levels of organizational capability.
Organizations typically progress through these stages as they improve engineering communication, invention documentation, knowledge retention, and innovation workflows.
Level 1 — Informal Communication
Innovation knowledge primarily exists in people’s heads.
Typical characteristics:
• Verbal discussions
• Inconsistent documentation
• Lost invention opportunities
• Knowledge silos
• Heavy dependence on key individuals
• Limited visibility
Level 2 — Basic Documentation
Important inventions are documented.
Typical characteristics:
• Engineering notes
• Basic disclosures
• Inconsistent diagrams
• Limited standardization
• Manual handoffs
• Partial visibility
Level 3 — Collaborative Innovation Development
Multiple stakeholders contribute to invention development.
Typical characteristics:
• Engineers collaborate with IP teams
• Shared documentation
• Editable diagrams
• Improved invention reviews
• Better communication
• More consistent disclosures
Level 4 — Standardized Innovation Workflows
Innovation processes are documented and repeatable.
Typical characteristics:
• Standard disclosure processes
• Templates
• Review procedures
• Visual communication standards
• Training resources
• Knowledge management practices
Level 5 — Strategic Innovation Capability
Innovation communication becomes an organizational asset.
Typical characteristics:
• Innovation champions
• Continuous improvement
• Knowledge reuse
• Portfolio leverage
• Cross-functional collaboration
• Scalable innovation infrastructure
Time Required: 5-10 Minutes
What You'll Receive
Current Maturity Level
Capability Gap Analysis
Improvement Roadmap
Strategic Recommendations
Take the Assessment
Rate each statement from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
Level 1 — Informal Communication
1. Innovation knowledge often depends on specific individuals.
2. Important invention details are sometimes lost.
3. Engineering communication is inconsistent.
4. Documentation quality varies significantly.
5. Innovation visibility is limited.
Level 2 — Basic Documentation
1. Important inventions are documented.
2. Engineering teams maintain invention records.
3. Disclosure preparation is possible from existing documentation.
4. Technical information is generally accessible.
5. Documentation supports future reference.
Level 3 — Collaborative Innovation Development
1. Engineering and IP teams collaborate effectively.
2. Visual communication is used regularly.
3. Disclosures benefit from cross-functional participation.
4. Innovation discussions involve relevant stakeholders.
5. Collaboration improves invention quality.
Level 4 — Standardized Innovation Workflows
1. Innovation processes are documented.
2. Disclosure standards exist.
3. Review procedures are consistent.
4. Knowledge management practices exist.
5. Training resources are available.
Level 5 — Strategic Innovation Capability
1. Innovation communication is viewed as a strategic capability.
2. Knowledge reuse is encouraged.
3. Innovation assets are leveraged across projects.
4. Innovation infrastructure supports growth.
5. Innovation capability contributes to competitive advantage.
Leadership & Continuous Improvement
1. Leadership actively supports innovation capability development.
2. Innovation performance is monitored.
3. Improvement initiatives are ongoing.
4. Knowledge sharing is encouraged.
5. Innovation processes continuously improve.
Assessment Complete
Get Your Personalized Workflow Report
Enter your information below and we'll send additional workflow recommendations and resources.
Ready to Evaluate Your Innovation Communication Capability?
Build a Higher-Maturity Innovation Organization
Organizations that improve innovation communication often accelerate invention disclosures, improve patent quality, reduce rework, and increase portfolio value.